The volunteers who run the Town of Lincoln, Massachusetts have proposed spending roughly $100 million of taxpayer funds to demolish the current K-8 school building, move the students into trailers for three years, and construct a new building in roughly the same location within the 71-acre campus.
Perhaps it is time to consider the higher-level question of “Given our desire and ability to pour additional financial resources into school spending, how can we make our school better?”
Questions to ask at the December 1, 2018 town meeting:
- Why are we gutting/demolishing the current school, which our own architects and engineers say will last at least 20-30 more years with minimal maintenance expense? (see this analysis of the 2017 Existing Conditions report and this comparison with the 2012 report and the 2017 report itself, which gives the expected life of many building systems)
- Why do we think that a new building will improve academic outcomes? The best-performing schools in Massachusetts were built in the 1950s. Average SAT scores at Newton North dropped slightly for students who’d enjoyed four full years in the $197 million new building. (details)
- Given that we have been paying into a state fund for a new school every time we shop (via a sales tax earmark), why wouldn’t we just wait for the experts at the MSBA to fund and manage our new school project? There is no urgent need for a new building (see above). SBC members say that it could be 5 years before it is Lincoln’s turn to be funded (roughly 50 percent) by the MSBA, but why can’t we wait 5 years to save $50 million? (enough to give each current teacher a $1 million bonus) (see “Is Lincoln eligible for MSBA funding?” for notes on an 11/19/2018 conversation with an MSBA Board member)
- Why wouldn’t we build a new school somewhere else on the 71-acre campus and use the current building for some other purpose? The current building was renovated or new in 1994, just 24 years ago. From the 2017 existing conditions report: the building has been very well maintained” and “The building structure, including the foundation, walls and roof is generally in satisfactory condition.” Why demolish a building worth at least $50 million?
- MSBA-funded projects, even on much smaller campuses, build the new school in a parking lot or athletic field of the old school, so that students need not be displaced into trailers. Given our 71-acre campus, why are we pushing students into trailers for three years? (best case; assumes no project delays) Who gave us the right to impair a current student’s education with a trailer environment so that a future student could have an improved education in a newer-than-1994 school building?
This site provides background and supports discussion on at least the following topics:
- What are the Lincoln Public Schools? (544 students in K-8, roughly 440 of whom live in Lincoln, 84 of whom come from Boston via the METCO program, and about 20 of whom are children of teachers who live in nearby towns; there is also a preschool program that operates in a separate building)
- What do people who teach and learn in the school every day say would improve our schools?
- What is the focus on school building costing the town?
- How do the Lincoln Public Schools compare academically to other Boston-area schools?
- How do Lincoln’s taxes and financial resources compare to other towns and cities?
- How much do we spend now on the Lincoln Public Schools? How much will we be spending if we borrow $100 million to construct a new building?
- How far would $100 million go if used to pay teachers?
- What is the condition of the current building?
- What is the correlation between age/condition of school building and academic performance?
- What is the minimum that we could spend on the current building? (about $1 million extra per year for the next 5-6 years)
- If we do want to build a new building, should we do it with or without MSBA participation, advice, and funding?
- How will a completed $100 million town-paid building change the town?
- What about Net Zero?
- Middle Ground: Build, but don’t Bulldoze (Philip’s personal favorite plan)
- October 2018: Over a four-month period in which no actual work was done, the project ballooned in cost from $94 million to $110 million. This 17 percent increase was disguised via Enron-style off-balance-sheet accounting in a scheme to borrow money from a solar panel vendor. Instead of $94 million and a $0 electricity bill, the town would agree to a multi-decade “power purchase agreement” from the folks who pay up front for the solar panels.
Off-topic, but fun
- Comparing the proposed students-in-trailers and $100 million in spending to Magellan’s voyage and aircraft carrier construction cost
- Is school building a religion?
- Mental gymnastics required to support the Lincoln School Building projects
Down in the Weeds:
- Is Lincoln eligible for MSBA funding?
- Given the hot Boston construction market, is it possible to build a school reasonably quickly and inexpensively? (MSBA says “Yes, look how the charter schools do it with modular construction and split-system heat pumps”)
- What do other communities spend when they build a school?
- Is the Lincoln school system dragged down by poor performance at Hanscom?